TechForge

24th November 2021

Germany doesn’t agree with the assessment that Open RAN (O-RAN) provides a more secure alternative to certain vendors.

A US-led campaign warning that Chinese vendors such as Huawei pose a security risk led many governments to ban or restrict the use of such equipment in national infrastructure. The exile of vendors that have provided equipment for multiple generations of networks has been costly for operators and set back their rollouts.

O-RAN has been hailed as the solution to deliver cost-efficient, secure, and interoperable equipment that avoids the “lock-in” of the legacy vendors.

A report from Germany’s Federal Office for Information Security (translated to English, or Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik – abbreviated as BSI – in German) claims that O-RAN is anything but secure.

Germany’s report warns that mixing products from various suppliers is likely to cause problems and that not enough work has been done on the standards side to ensure that O-RAN is secure.

Arne Schönbohm, President of the BSI, said:

“As a federal cyber security authority, the BSI observes and accompanies the development process of Open RAN. Therefore, we have commissioned a risk analysis that analyses various affected persons and attacker groups and evaluates the risks to the central protection goals of confidentiality, integrity, imputability, availability, and privacy.

The study demonstrates on the basis of a best/worst case view that the previous Open RAN has not yet been sufficiently specified according to security by design and partially has security risks.

The security improvements should therefore be included in the specifications from the study in order to be able to serve the rapid growth of Open RAN in the market from the outset with sufficiently secure products.”

The report was outsourced to cybersecurity firm Secunet to produce. At 86 pages long, and entirely in German, it provides some hefty reading.

Translated into English, what perhaps summarises the report best is that “medium to high security risks emanate from a multiplicity of the interfaces and components specified in O-RAN.”

Secunet recommends that “security improvements are now included in the specification to avoid a security debacle like the one that occurred with the development of the 3GPP standards this time.”

A full copy of the report in German is available here (PDF)

(Photo by Maheshkumar Painam on Unsplash)

Want to hear more about cybersecurity from leading experts in the space? Check out the Cyber Security & Cloud Expo taking place in Amsterdam on 23-24 November 2021.

About the Author

Senior Editor

Ryan Daws is a senior editor at TechForge Media with over a decade of experience in crafting compelling narratives and making complex topics accessible. His articles and interviews with industry leaders have earned him recognition as a key influencer by organisations like Onalytica. Under his leadership, publications have been praised by analyst firms such as Forrester for their excellence and performance. Connect with him on X (@gadget_ry), Bluesky (@gadgetry.bsky.social), and/or Mastodon (@gadgetry@techhub.social)

Related

LG Uplus sets TM Forum benchmark for autonomous networks

28th August 2026

US seizes domains for Chinese QScan and QTRouter hacking tools

27th August 2026

Satellite IoT connections forecast to hit 197.7M by 2035

25th August 2026

SoftBank and Ericsson test AI scheduler on live Japan 5G network

21st August 2026

Join our Community

Subscribe now to get all our premium content and latest tech news delivered straight to your inbox

Popular

Customer engagement and billing are vital to a CSP’s success

7828 view(s)

T-Mobile and Ericsson test AI-RAN on live 5G Advanced network

1421 view(s)

Ericsson adds AI in RAN software for 5G network optimisation

1012 view(s)

How Indosat is scaling AI-RAN across its network

938 view(s)

Subscribe

All our premium content and latest tech news delivered straight to your inbox

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.